atom feed22 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 21, 2005 10:16 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 1:54 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 22, 2005 7:31 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 7:42 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 22, 2005 8:22 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 8:38 am 
günter geigerNov 22, 2005 9:03 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 9:29 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 22, 2005 10:10 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 2:09 am 
Thomas GrillNov 23, 2005 3:31 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 4:22 am 
Thomas GrillNov 23, 2005 4:25 am 
geigerNov 23, 2005 7:38 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 7:46 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 8:41 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 8:50 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 8:51 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 8:53 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 2:34 pm 
geigerNov 24, 2005 2:09 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 30, 2005 9:44 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report
From:IOhannes m zmoelnig (zmoe@iem.at)
Date:Nov 23, 2005 7:46:01 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

geiger wrote:

it doesn't say anything about non-alphanumeric characters (except for the underscore), so i am a bit afraid of that.

Well, a bad example then, what about "x0" instead of "0x", or whatever doesnt start as a numeric value.

nice idea. (but wouldn't that be even more confusing than having an arbitrary prefix?)

probably it would be easiest to just prepend "_" and keep the 0x notation.

mfg.asdr. IOhannes