On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris McCormick<chr...@mccormick.cx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:30:29PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Yep, it's a damn pity I used the tabwrite~ name for the wrong object! We're
all stuck with it now.
I've been planning to put an object like this into Pd for many years, but
can't think of a "correct" name... anyone have a better idea than "tabwriteat~"
Maybe you could pass [tabwrite~] an argument to specify whether it should have
an extra 'index' inlet?
Doesn't tabwrite~ have a second inlet to set the name of the array
(It's been awhile)? If so, then what harm could there be in
re-writing the object with 3 inlets? Would it break something?
Pd-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list