atom feed10 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-sparc64Netra T1 105 (sparc64) optimization
FromSent OnAttachments
Alexandre VieiraNov 29, 2006 7:24 am 
Miles NordinNov 29, 2006 9:23 pm 
Andrew BelashovNov 29, 2006 11:51 pm 
Alexandre VieiraNov 30, 2006 4:56 am 
Christian WaltherNov 30, 2006 7:00 am 
Alexandre VieiraNov 30, 2006 8:50 am 
Miles NordinNov 30, 2006 11:04 am 
Alexandre VieiraNov 30, 2006 12:08 pm 
Miles NordinNov 30, 2006 2:24 pm 
Kris KennawayNov 30, 2006 2:31 pm 
Subject:Netra T1 105 (sparc64) optimization
From:Alexandre Vieira (nul@gmail.com)
Date:Nov 30, 2006 12:08:35 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-sparc64

On 11/30/06, Miles Nordin <car@ivy.net> wrote:

"av" == Alexandre Vieira <nul@gmail.com> writes:

av> polling increased dramaticly the latency for all traffic that av> passes trough the bridge and reduced the transmission rate av> also.

That's interesting. What do you mean by transmission rate? Are you seeing dropped packets?

_______________________________________________ free@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free@freebsd.org"

No, it just doesn't transfer as many as it does without polling.

Without polling it transfers like 8MB/s, with polling it does less than this and there is twice the latency.

-- Alexandre Vieira - nul@gmail.com