atom feed40 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsports/www is too full
FromSent OnAttachments
Edwin GroothuisOct 22, 2004 12:45 am 
Frank LaszloOct 22, 2004 7:36 am 
Adam WeinbergerOct 22, 2004 7:36 am 
Robin SchoonoverOct 22, 2004 9:01 am 
Robert HuffOct 22, 2004 9:16 am 
Benjamin LutzOct 22, 2004 9:23 am 
Robert HuffOct 22, 2004 9:24 am 
Mark LinimonOct 22, 2004 9:32 am 
Mike EdenfieldOct 22, 2004 9:33 am 
Oliver LehmannOct 22, 2004 9:46 am 
Robert HuffOct 22, 2004 10:41 am 
Lowell GilbertOct 22, 2004 1:07 pm 
Lowell GilbertOct 22, 2004 1:08 pm 
Paul ChvostekOct 22, 2004 1:14 pm 
Robin SchoonoverOct 22, 2004 3:52 pm 
Christopher NehrenOct 22, 2004 3:54 pm 
Paul ChvostekOct 22, 2004 5:17 pm 
ParvOct 22, 2004 6:55 pm 
Jim TriggOct 22, 2004 8:26 pm 
Michael NottebrockOct 24, 2004 8:24 am 
Jose M RodriguezOct 24, 2004 8:47 am 
Jie GaoOct 26, 2004 12:40 pm 
Tillman HodgsonOct 26, 2004 12:47 pm 
Matt DouhanOct 26, 2004 12:54 pm 
Tillman HodgsonOct 26, 2004 1:01 pm 
Jie GaoOct 26, 2004 4:19 pm 
Michael NottebrockOct 26, 2004 5:59 pm 
Michael NottebrockOct 26, 2004 6:01 pm 
Benjamin LutzOct 26, 2004 7:13 pm 
Robert HuffOct 26, 2004 7:49 pm 
Tillman HodgsonOct 26, 2004 8:12 pm 
Mark LinimonOct 26, 2004 8:35 pm 
Mark LinimonOct 26, 2004 8:41 pm 
Tillman HodgsonOct 26, 2004 9:03 pm 
Matthew SeamanOct 27, 2004 1:17 am 
Frank J. LaszloOct 27, 2004 4:02 am 
Tillman HodgsonOct 27, 2004 7:07 am 
Roman NeuhauserNov 9, 2004 5:11 pm 
Radek KozlowskiNov 9, 2004 5:31 pm 
Roman NeuhauserNov 10, 2004 4:59 pm 
Subject:ports/www is too full
From:Jie Gao (jeff@gmail.com)
Date:Oct 26, 2004 12:40:06 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ports

I agree this. If we have a powerful search utility instead of the simple "make search", it doesn't matter how large the directories are.

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:33:48 -0400, Mike Edenfield <kut@kutulu.org> wrote:

Benjamin Lutz wrote:

Reading between the lines, the problem you're having is that the ports aren't well enough categorized at the moment. How about borrowing an idea from some of the knowledge databases, and using keywords to mark ports? Eg, instead of creating a www-server category, the apache port could be marked "server www". linux-opera could be market "binary browser client linux www" or something like that.

FreeBSD already has "virtual" categories -- categories that aren't used to physically sort the ports. For example, devel/tcl84/Makefile has: CATEGORIES= lang tcl84

tcl84 isn't a real folders, but it's listed in a number of port's $ make search key=tcl84 | grep "Port:" | wc -l 40

One thing I don't see is a way to search or sort by category, but I admit to not having looking very hard.