atom feed20 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRe: [office] style name uniqueness
FromSent OnAttachments
Lars OppermannJan 11, 2006 9:26 am 
Bruce D'ArcusJan 11, 2006 10:22 am 
Lars OppermannJan 12, 2006 2:36 am 
Bruce D'ArcusJan 12, 2006 6:51 am 
Bruce D'ArcusJan 12, 2006 7:16 am 
David FaureMar 10, 2006 10:33 am 
Patrick DurusauMar 11, 2006 4:40 pm 
David FaureMar 13, 2006 2:36 pm 
Daniel CarreraMar 13, 2006 2:57 pm 
Florian ReuterMar 14, 2006 1:00 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgMar 14, 2006 1:18 am 
Florian ReuterMar 14, 2006 2:08 am 
David A. WheelerMar 14, 2006 8:17 am 
David FaureJan 4, 2008 1:55 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgJan 24, 2008 4:55 am 
David FaureFeb 4, 2008 7:53 am 
David FaureFeb 4, 2008 8:04 am 
Patrick DurusauFeb 4, 2008 8:27 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgFeb 22, 2008 6:15 am 
David FaureFeb 22, 2008 7:19 am 
Subject:Re: [office] style name uniqueness
From:Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg (Mich@Sun.COM)
Date:Mar 14, 2006 1:18:52 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

Hi,

Florian Reuter wrote On 03/14/06 10:03,:

Daniel Carrera schrieb:

OK, so the spec is not unclear, but it's still cumbersome to implement IMHO.

Requiring style name uniqueness accross style families might cause another set of complications.

Why? We have style:name and style:display-name, so you could easily say

style:name="ID1" style:display-name="Tips" style:family="paragraph" style:name="ID2" style:display-name="Tips" style:family="text" style:name="ID3" style:display-name="Notes" style:family="paragraph" style:name="ID4" style:display-name="Notes" style:family="text"

Wouldn't that be sufficient?

For a machine, this may be readable. But if a human wants to create an OpenDocument document using for instance an XML editor, then it is probably much easier for her or him if they can use the names "Tips" and "Notes" directly and don't have to use ids whose names themselves are meaningless.

Michael