Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Colman Reilly | Jul 5, 1997 3:43 am | |
| Adam Shostack | Jul 5, 1997 8:17 am | |
| Colman Reilly | Jul 5, 1997 2:33 pm | |
| Jordan K. Hubbard | Jul 5, 1997 4:47 pm | |
| Christopher Petrilli | Jul 6, 1997 11:27 am | |
| Jonathan M. Bresler | Jul 6, 1997 2:50 pm | |
| Brian Mitchell | Jul 6, 1997 3:20 pm | |
| Jonathan M. Bresler | Jul 6, 1997 5:13 pm | |
| Colman Reilly | Jul 7, 1997 1:45 am | |
| Duane H. Hesser | Jul 7, 1997 7:48 am | |
| Robert N Watson | Jul 7, 1997 10:08 am | |
| Brian Mitchell | Jul 7, 1997 10:58 am | |
| Adam Shostack | Jul 7, 1997 11:03 am | |
| Sean Eric Fagan | Jul 7, 1997 11:37 am | |
| Robert N Watson | Jul 7, 1997 11:46 am | |
| Jonathan M. Bresler | Jul 7, 1997 11:53 am | |
| Robert Watson | Jul 7, 1997 1:04 pm | |
| Kenneth Stailey | Jul 7, 1997 1:05 pm | |
| Brian Mitchell | Jul 7, 1997 1:38 pm | |
| pro...@suburbia.net | Jul 7, 1997 2:29 pm | |
| Jim Shankland | Jul 7, 1997 3:46 pm | |
| Daniel O'Callaghan | Jul 7, 1997 4:20 pm | |
| Mark Newton | Jul 7, 1997 4:47 pm | |
| Adam Shostack | Jul 7, 1997 5:58 pm | |
| Adam Shostack | Jul 7, 1997 6:09 pm | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jul 7, 1997 11:10 pm | |
| Robert Watson | Jul 8, 1997 8:45 am | |
| Robert Watson | Jul 8, 1997 8:58 am | |
| Colman Reilly | Jul 8, 1997 12:33 pm | |
| Ollivier Robert | Jul 8, 1997 1:20 pm | |
| George Robbins | Jul 8, 1997 1:59 pm | |
| Mark Newton | Jul 8, 1997 5:29 pm | |
| Robert Watson | Jul 9, 1997 9:09 am | |
| Eivind Eklund | Jul 9, 1997 9:57 am | |
| David Holland | Jul 9, 1997 3:09 pm | |
| Wes Peters | Jul 9, 1997 10:07 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Security Model/Target for FreeBSD or 4.4? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jim Shankland (ja...@flyingfox.com) | |
| Date: | Jul 7, 1997 3:46:36 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-security | |
something along the lines of:
net.inet.ip.<portnumber> <uid>
and then using it like
sysctl -w net.inet.ip.25=`id smtp`
Unfortunately, that doesn't address the distinction between TCP and UDP services.. I'm not sure that is a huge issue, but it seems relevant.
Sure, that should be:
sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.25=`id smtp` sysctl -w net.inet.udp.53=`id named`
or whatever. No biggie.
Of course, we already have a permissions system. Why not:
-rw-rw---- 1 root smtp Feb 18 09:33 /protocols/inet/tcp/25
Or is that just too weird?
Jim Shankland Flying Fox Computer Systems, Inc.





