I think it is a good idea to have this alias and discuss any issues. From my
previous experiences, we are still in the early stages, but as we progress
there would be many issues which are fit to be discussed in this forum.
Am off to Amsterdam/London tomorrow. Will have to attend the con calls from
airports, planes, trains and automobiles ;-)
|From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve....@east.sun.com]
|Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 8:09 AM
|Subject: Welcome to security-leaders
|Hi folks-- This list replaces the old security-editors list. I'd like us
|to conduct planning discussions here (such as how to structure the F2F
|agenda, planning "leaders-only" telecons, etc.). For now, I would like
|people to respond to my mail of yesterday if they haven't already
|to me privately:
|In the next telecon, I will be asking for motions to name the spec, and I
|will propose to consider them in order of apparent popularity given the
|poll results. If the top contender has majority support, it will
|win. Then all attempts to discuss it will be ruled out of order.
|On the matter of what we should be spending our time on, I'd like to ask
|the subgroup leaders to take up Strawman #2 with their groups, and
|provide feedback to the use-case group as soon as possible. What
|requirements are missing? What requirements are too
|implementation-focused? What requirements should be out of scope? I'd
|like the "technical theme" of the next telecon to be requirements, with
|Darren giving a report on the substance of the strawman and the other
|subgroups giving a report on their reactions.
|Since we haven't really used this list for leader communications yet, I
|would appreciate it if I could hear back from all the subgroup leaders with
|their thoughts on this approach.
|Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
|Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ east.sun.com