atom feed19 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: tuning for samba
FromSent OnAttachments
Chad DavidJul 10, 2002 5:06 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorJul 10, 2002 5:14 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorJul 10, 2002 5:15 pm 
Chad DavidJul 10, 2002 5:40 pm 
Chad DavidJul 10, 2002 5:44 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorJul 10, 2002 6:03 pm 
Richard SharpeJul 10, 2002 6:50 pm 
Richard SharpeJul 10, 2002 7:09 pm 
Dan NelsonJul 10, 2002 7:35 pm 
Chad DavidJul 10, 2002 8:30 pm 
Darren PilgrimJul 10, 2002 11:30 pm 
Darren PilgrimJul 11, 2002 12:15 am 
Darren PilgrimJul 11, 2002 12:33 am 
Richard SharpeJul 11, 2002 12:52 am 
Richard SharpeJul 11, 2002 1:32 am 
Chad DavidJul 11, 2002 7:32 am 
Doug BartonJul 14, 2002 2:45 pm 
Richard SharpeJul 14, 2002 4:15 pm 
Chad DavidJul 23, 2002 11:39 am 
Subject:Re: tuning for samba
From:Daniel O'Connor (doco@gsoft.com.au)
Date:Jul 10, 2002 6:03:50 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 10:14, Chad David wrote:

This is my biggest concern. I just don't know what to tune here since the data just basically passes straight through the box, and the with about of data being served and the access patterns buffering is pointless.

I disagree.. Buffering is probably going to help - even just a little.

One thing I failed to mention, none of the clients ever write; the system is completely read only.

Ahh.. well you can throw any type of 'real' locking away and tell samba to fake it all I guess.

You should also look at the acregmin/acregmax/acdirmin/acdirmax options - if the store is static then you could probably increase them quite a lot which would reduce NFS traffic.

Also don't forget to run nfsiod.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message