37 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] output grayscale value of pi...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| pablo das neves bicho | Feb 12, 2007 2:13 pm | |
| Claude Heiland-Allen | Feb 12, 2007 2:46 pm | |
| marius schebella | Feb 12, 2007 3:13 pm | |
| jared | Feb 12, 2007 5:48 pm | |
| Chuckk Hubbard | Feb 12, 2007 6:15 pm | |
| Chuckk Hubbard | Feb 12, 2007 6:37 pm | |
| jared | Feb 12, 2007 7:15 pm | |
| Spencer Russell | Feb 12, 2007 8:10 pm | |
| Alexandre Matheson | Feb 12, 2007 8:11 pm |  .zip |
| jared | Feb 12, 2007 8:25 pm | |
| Alexandre Matheson | Feb 12, 2007 8:30 pm | .pd |
| patrick | Feb 12, 2007 8:55 pm | |
| Chuckk Hubbard | Feb 12, 2007 9:05 pm | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 12, 2007 11:54 pm | |
| Jamie Bullock | Feb 13, 2007 12:23 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 13, 2007 12:58 am | |
| Steffen | Feb 13, 2007 3:17 am | |
| adam armfield | Feb 13, 2007 6:12 am | |
| jared | Feb 13, 2007 9:58 am | |
| Kyle Klipowicz | Feb 13, 2007 10:25 am | |
| Max Neupert | Feb 13, 2007 10:34 am | |
| 'Frank Barknecht' | Feb 13, 2007 10:35 am | |
| marius schebella | Feb 13, 2007 10:37 am | |
| jared | Feb 13, 2007 10:55 am | |
| patrick | Feb 13, 2007 11:00 am | |
| Roman Haefeli | Feb 13, 2007 11:36 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 13, 2007 3:07 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | Feb 13, 2007 5:46 pm | |
| jared | Feb 13, 2007 7:55 pm | |
| carmen | Feb 13, 2007 8:15 pm | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 14, 2007 12:37 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 14, 2007 12:42 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 14, 2007 12:55 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 14, 2007 2:15 am | |
| Steffen | Feb 14, 2007 2:24 am | |
| Roman Haefeli | Feb 14, 2007 3:38 am | |
| Chuckk Hubbard | Feb 14, 2007 6:30 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] output grayscale value of pixels in a video | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | IOhannes m zmoelnig (zmoe...@iem.at) | |
| Date: | Feb 14, 2007 12:37:58 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
marius schebella wrote:
zmoe...@iem.at wrote:
in Gem you could use [pix_dump] and [pix_pix2sig~] to get the pixel values. so all in all: all of the "still alive" video frameworks for Pd support this operation.
so do you title Gem as "still alive"? which means for me that it is not under development anymore???
yes i title Gem as "still alive"; i don't know how this positively correlates to "not under development anymore", which i would call "dead" (e.g. "_not_ alive").
probably i should have said "alive" instead of "still alive", because the "still" might imply a "soon to end", which was not my intention.
i probably should have also omitted the quotes in order to avoid hints of irony which where out of my intention too.
mfg.ntr-a IOhannes