9 messages in com.mysql.lists.mysqlRE: Migration from ORACLE 9i to MySQL| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Nguyen, Phong | 28 Jul 2005 09:41 | |
| Johnson, Michael | 28 Jul 2005 10:56 | |
| SGr...@unimin.com | 28 Jul 2005 11:24 | |
| Scott Hamm | 28 Jul 2005 11:40 | |
| Warren Young | 28 Jul 2005 11:40 | |
| Martijn Tonies | 29 Jul 2005 00:41 | |
| Nguyen, Phong | 29 Jul 2005 05:02 | |
| Nguyen, Phong | 29 Jul 2005 05:10 | |
| Sid Lane | 29 Jul 2005 07:59 |
| Subject: | RE: Migration from ORACLE 9i to MySQL |
|---|---|
| From: | Nguyen, Phong (Phon...@disa.mil) |
| Date: | 07/29/2005 05:02:11 AM |
| List: | com.mysql.lists.mysql |
Shawn Green,
You are right? I agree as you said "Sure MySQL may have a few fewer "bells and whistles" than Oracle but if you don't need to rely on all of the gee-whiz and just need fast, stable data storage and retrieval, MySQL is an excellent choice".
Thank you for input,
Nguyen
-----Original Message----- From: SGr...@unimin.com [mailto:SGr...@unimin.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 2:25 PM To: Johnson, Michael Cc: mys...@lists.mysql.com; 'Nguyen, Phong' Subject: RE: Migration from ORACLE 9i to MySQL
"Johnson, Michael " <Mich...@oln-afmc.af.mil> wrote on 07/28/2005 01:56:33 PM:
Why are you going backwards ???? MySql is an 8th grade toy.
-----Original Message----- From: Nguyen, Phong [mailto:Phon...@disa.mil] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:42 AM To: mys...@lists.mysql.com Subject: Migration from ORACLE 9i to MySQL
I will be migrating Oracle database 9i to Mysql. Do anyone have any experience in doing this?. Please share with us!
Thank you very much,
V/R,
Nguyen
-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=Mich...@oln-afmc.af.mil
Maybe the US Air Force has an unlimited budget but the rest of us do not. It seems to me that they "powers that be" in Nguyen's shop have made a decision (rational or not, you know how some managers are) to move away from a PREMIUM-priced package like 9i to something that can perform comparably to 9i but at a small fraction of the cost. Calling it an "8th grade toy" makes you sound uninformed of what MySQL is really capable of.
Sure MySQL may have a few fewer "bells and whistles" than Oracle but if you don't need to rely on all of the gee-whiz and just need fast, stable data storage and retrieval, MySQL is an excellent choice. Besides, most of those "fancy things" in the premium databases can be duplicated or nearly duplicated using very little client-side code. Of the things that cannot be run in client-side code (I am particularly thinking of stored procedures and triggers) those are coming in 5.0.x.
Do you think NASA, Yahoo, and a host of other Fortune 100 companies made a mistake by using MySQL in their production enviroments? I don't.
Respectfully,
Shawn Green Database Administrator Unimin Corporation - Spruce Pine