atom feed216 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: Free wicket from component hierar...
FromSent OnAttachments
132 earlier messages
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 8:50 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:56 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:57 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:03 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:05 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:11 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:13 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:16 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:22 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
SebastianNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:41 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:42 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:45 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:51 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:00 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:04 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:29 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:36 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:52 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:54 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:59 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:02 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:08 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 11:10 am 
Michael BrinkmanNov 9, 2010 11:27 am 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:03 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:15 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:17 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:22 pm 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:42 pm 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 12:45 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:57 pm 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 12:58 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 1:04 pm 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 12:48 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 1:04 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 1:23 am 
James CarmanNov 10, 2010 4:31 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 5:08 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 10, 2010 6:18 am 
James CarmanNov 10, 2010 6:23 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:17 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:22 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:23 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 14, 2011 8:44 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 18, 2011 1:03 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 18, 2011 1:22 am 
Martin MakundiJan 18, 2011 1:24 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 18, 2011 1:42 am 
Martin MakundiJan 18, 2011 1:45 am 
Martijn DashorstJan 18, 2011 1:51 am 
Martijn DashorstJan 18, 2011 1:54 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 18, 2011 12:47 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 19, 2011 1:55 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 20, 2011 7:41 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 20, 2011 9:16 am 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 9:24 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 20, 2011 9:37 am 
Jim PinkhamJan 20, 2011 9:50 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 20, 2011 9:59 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 20, 2011 11:40 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 20, 2011 11:47 am 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 12:13 pm 
Martin GrigorovJan 20, 2011 12:25 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 12:33 pm 
James CarmanJan 20, 2011 1:42 pm 
Igor VaynbergJan 20, 2011 2:11 pm 
James CarmanJan 20, 2011 2:17 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 10:51 pm 
Subject:Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell
From:Carl-Eric Menzel (cmen@wicketbuch.de)
Date:Nov 10, 2010 12:48:54 am
List:org.apache.wicket.users

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:49:32 -0500 James Carman <jam@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

Are you moving a field from one form to another? But that does change the semantics, doesn't it? If it doesn't, why are there two forms?

Both forms "edit" one particular object (say a Person). They just edit different values on the same object. Again, I'm not sure this is the best example, but it's at least plausible.

So either there is a difference between the forms (different submit method maybe?), then this move would make a semantic/behavioral difference and needs to be done in code.

Or there is no difference at all. Why are there two forms then? Just use one.

No offense meant, but this does not seem to be a plausible example to me.

Carl-Eric www.wicketbuch.de