atom feed39 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: making the snoop device loadable.
FromSent OnAttachments
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 12:04 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:19 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 3:33 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 6:25 am 
Daniel C. SobralJul 9, 2000 6:52 am 
Boris PopovJul 9, 2000 7:20 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 10:45 am 
Poul-Henning KampJul 9, 2000 10:49 am 
Wilko BulteJul 9, 2000 10:59 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 11:12 am 
Poul-Henning KampJul 9, 2000 11:16 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 11:56 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 12:06 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 12:35 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 1:13 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:19 pm 
John BaldwinJul 9, 2000 1:24 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:25 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:30 pm 
John BaldwinJul 9, 2000 1:34 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 2:56 pm 
John BaldwinJul 9, 2000 3:08 pm 
Doug BartonJul 9, 2000 4:39 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:40 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:45 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:47 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:53 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 4:56 pm 
Jeroen C. van GelderenJul 9, 2000 5:36 pm 
Jeroen C. van GelderenJul 9, 2000 5:38 pm 
Jeroen C. van GelderenJul 9, 2000 5:44 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 6:02 pm 
Mike SmithJul 9, 2000 8:27 pm 
Mike SmithJul 9, 2000 8:35 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 9:06 pm 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 10, 2000 12:08 am 
Peter WemmJul 10, 2000 1:01 am 
Andrzej BialeckiJul 10, 2000 3:36 am 
Bruce EvansJul 10, 2000 4:48 am 
Subject:Re: making the snoop device loadable.
From:Adam (bs@looksharp.net)
Date:Jul 9, 2000 11:56:40 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

In message <Pine@turtle.looksharp.net>, Adam writes:

On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

If this change goes in, what do you do if you wish not to have snooping capable through the snp device and do not wish to lock unneccessary parts of the system down with securelevel?

You do the same as before: Hold on tight to your root password.

I dont like kernel changes that make the kernel do less babysitting and me more. Tough, I guess.

You have always needed to babysit your root password.

Ok, I give in to the argument. I would just like to make a wish. On Jan 24 1999 peter took the NO_LKM option out of LINT. I assume the support for it in other files was removed around that time also. Could someone implement a NO_KLD option so you dont need to use securelevel > 0 so people have an obvious option and dont have to know the kernel well enough to hack syscalls.master?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message