| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mathieu Bouchard | Sep 23, 2005 11:17 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Sep 29, 2005 11:16 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Sep 29, 2005 11:29 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Sep 29, 2005 11:30 pm | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Sep 30, 2005 12:42 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Sep 30, 2005 12:55 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Sep 30, 2005 2:19 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Sep 30, 2005 2:22 am | |
| Thomas Grill | Sep 30, 2005 2:30 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Sep 30, 2005 3:15 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Sep 30, 2005 3:54 am | |
| David Plans Casal | Sep 30, 2005 4:24 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Sep 30, 2005 4:36 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 3, 2005 9:27 pm | |
| David Plans Casal | Oct 4, 2005 12:48 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Oct 5, 2005 9:44 pm | |
| David Plans Casal | Oct 5, 2005 11:58 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Oct 6, 2005 4:55 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 6, 2005 11:45 am | |
| Guenter Geiger | Oct 6, 2005 12:21 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 6, 2005 12:35 pm | |
| Thomas Grill | Oct 6, 2005 1:35 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Oct 6, 2005 4:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 8:24 am | |
| David Plans Casal | Oct 7, 2005 8:52 am | |
| Guenter Geiger | Oct 7, 2005 9:16 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 9:01 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 9:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 11:22 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Oct 8, 2005 4:48 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 10, 2005 5:28 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD-dev] uninitialized values bug | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Tim Blechmann (TimB...@gmx.net) | |
| Date: | Oct 6, 2005 12:35:55 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
Why should I make efforts to contribute to a branch I don't plan to continue to use, and that I wish gets replaced by devel_0_39 in day-to-day use?
But I can definitely tell you now that any interest I might have had in helping the devel/inpure/whatever branch is rapidly evaporating. You guys need to come down off your high horses, you are all using Miller's Pd. Most of the code in that branch was still written by Miller.
yes, i second that. furthermore, i regret the arrogant attitude of people who think they invented a brand new program because they changed the interface.. don't judge a book by the cover...
don't forget that Miller is very busy, that he is making good efforts to incorporate useful changes and that he is a philosopher and writer so he doesn't spend all his time on code.
i'm just interested in having a click-free pd, and i posted some patches for having a threaded soundfiler that 2 years ago, i still using these patches.
well, pd is a piece of software, that is able to do a few things, and is lacking a lot of features ... (especially, it's not designed to be click-free)
a user interface is a pretty important part of the software, since it's the "interface" to the "user" ... a bit more, than the cover of a book. beside that, there are more severe changes in devel, (dsp) scheduling, threading, that aim to a clean solution, but they won't result in a clean solution, if 20000 groups of developers are inventing 20001 wheels ... some other changes that would result in a click-free software will require some even larger changes, not to mention that it will most likely collide with other changes, if it's not coordinated.
personally i have to admit, that i'm really fed up with this whole discussion. pd will probably me my audio programming language for the next few years, but it will definitely not be my long-term solution!
cheers ... tim
-- mailto:TimB...@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
latest mp3: kMW.mp3 http://mattin.org/mp3.html
latest cd: Goh Lee Kwang & Tim Blechmann: Drone http://www.geocities.com/gohleekwangtimblechmannduo/
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say "I want to see the manager." William S. Burroughs





