4 messages in edu.ku.nhm.mailman.taxacom, Bar Codes in tracking samples
FromSent OnAttachments
JAMES BLAKEAug 7, 1995 9:31 pm 
Julian HumphriesAug 8, 1995 9:37 am 
Julian HumphriesAug 8, 1995 6:29 pm 
Karen WilsonAug 9, 1995 7:47 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:, Bar Codes in tracking samplesActions...
From:JAMES BLAKE (jabl@IX.NETCOM.COM)
Date:Aug 7, 1995 9:31:03 pm
List:edu.ku.nhm.mailman.taxacom

Dear Taxonomists,

My goodness, one would think that bar codes are a nasty item and something to avoid given the bizarre comments of the past 24 hrs. As a point of fact, all a bar code represents is a unique number. Libraries are now bar coding their books so that incoming and outgoing loans are easily tracked and the database maintained. The bar code on a library book is merely its unique LC code and the same as etched on the spine of the book. Because most libraries have computerized catalogues these days, its makes sense to make life easier for the librarians. All they have to do is scan the code and a returned book is logged in, and then shelved.

There is no reason why museum specimens could not be similarly treated. Types and other specimens usually have a unique number, this can be converted to bar code. Again incoming and outgoing specimens can be easily tracked; loan sheets can be printed by a laser printer with the bar codes on it; the person who receives the loan signs it, and returns a copy that is scanned upon return and the tracking information is logged into the database. I could envision a situation where loans coming to end of term could be readily identified by a tickler program or something that would alert the curatorial assistants to remind the scientist to extend or return the loan. All these tools do is make life easier and allow the few individuals working in museum collections to be more efficient in their work.

Use of sample tracking software (and bar codes) has been in use in federal programs for quite some time. Precise sample tracking is required in any project that involves potentially hazardous materials; or where strict quality assurance of data is important. Note the lack of QA by the LAPD in tracking of OJ's blood sample.

My point is, that a very sophisticated, yet simple to use technology exists that could be used to assist museum staff in the logging and tracking of specimens. With most museums now computerizing their catalogues, the addition of sample tracking procedures is only one more step.

Obviously, there may be technical problems with putting such labels inside of jars with alcohol; associating them with small pinned insects; or dry stored molluscs in little boxes. Given all that we have achieved in recent years, including the ability to send this e-mail message, I am sure that someone will come up with convienent solutions to those problems.