32 messages in org.perl.cpan-testers-discussRe: The relation between CPAN Testers...
FromSent OnAttachments
David GoldenSep 3, 2008 2:09 pm 
Andrew MooreSep 3, 2008 2:28 pm 
David CantrellSep 4, 2008 6:39 am 
David CantrellSep 4, 2008 6:42 am 
David GoldenSep 4, 2008 7:28 am 
Gabor SzaboSep 4, 2008 7:35 am 
Greg Sabino MullaneSep 4, 2008 8:29 am 
Andy LesterSep 4, 2008 8:41 am 
chromaticSep 4, 2008 10:08 am 
Greg Sabino MullaneSep 4, 2008 11:19 am 
David GoldenSep 4, 2008 11:30 am 
Steffen SchwigonSep 4, 2008 11:42 am 
Andy LesterSep 4, 2008 11:52 am 
Andrew MooreSep 4, 2008 12:11 pm 
Andy LesterSep 4, 2008 12:21 pm 
Andrew MooreSep 4, 2008 12:29 pm 
BarbieSep 4, 2008 1:13 pm 
BramSep 4, 2008 1:13 pm 
David GoldenSep 4, 2008 1:56 pm 
Eric WilhelmSep 4, 2008 2:16 pm 
David E. WheelerSep 5, 2008 8:48 am 
David E. WheelerSep 5, 2008 9:07 am 
Andy LesterSep 5, 2008 9:13 am 
David E. WheelerSep 5, 2008 9:17 am 
chromaticSep 5, 2008 10:31 am 
David E. WheelerSep 5, 2008 11:22 am 
chromaticSep 5, 2008 11:35 am 
David E. WheelerSep 5, 2008 11:45 am 
Eric WilhelmSep 5, 2008 11:55 am 
Eric WilhelmSep 5, 2008 2:48 pm 
David GoldenSep 5, 2008 3:22 pm 
Eric WilhelmSep 5, 2008 4:41 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: The relation between CPAN Testers and quality (or why CPAN Testers sucks if you don't need it)Actions...
From:Andy Lester (an@petdance.com)
Date:Sep 4, 2008 8:41:17 am
List:org.perl.cpan-testers-discuss

On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

So the more successful CPAN Testers is in attracting new testers, the more duplicate FAIL reports authors are likely to receive, which makes them less likely to pay attention to them.

Sorry, but paying attention is the author's job. A fail is something that should be fixed, period, regardless of the number of them.

According to who? Who's to say what my job as an author is?