atom feed14 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xacmlRE: [xacml] legal values for Strings
FromSent OnAttachments
Seth ProctorMar 23, 2004 11:09 am 
Rich SalzMar 23, 2004 11:23 am 
Daniel EngovatovMar 23, 2004 11:24 am 
Seth ProctorMar 23, 2004 12:05 pm 
Seth ProctorMar 23, 2004 12:08 pm 
Daniel EngovatovMar 23, 2004 12:10 pm 
Satoshi HadaMar 23, 2004 11:27 pm 
Polar HumennMar 25, 2004 5:28 am 
Daniel EngovatovMar 25, 2004 9:47 am 
Tim MosesMar 25, 2004 10:51 am 
Daniel EngovatovMar 25, 2004 10:55 am 
Tim MosesMar 25, 2004 11:12 am 
Seth ProctorMar 26, 2004 9:12 am 
Seth ProctorMar 26, 2004 9:48 am 
Subject:RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings
From:Seth Proctor (Seth@Sun.COM)
Date:Mar 23, 2004 12:08:27 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.xacml

On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 14:40, Daniel Engovatov wrote:

None of the XACML standard data types had to be represented as complex content, so that would definitely be an extension. It seems to me that your example is not valid (need to have all the proper &lt etc..) - is it?

Well, I'd like the example I gave to be invalid. This gets back to my previous posting about AttributeAssignments. We have examples that look like:

<AttributeAssignment DataType="...:string" AttributeId="..." <AttributeSelector ... </AttributeAssignment>

As I read that, we're looking at an AttributeValue (the assignment) of type string that contains complex content. Thus, my concern.

seth