4 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] is it possible to set MED on ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Pierfrancesco CaciJan 5, 2005 10:22 am 
Vinny AbelloJan 6, 2005 12:33 am 
Manoj koshtiJan 6, 2005 3:29 pm 
Pierfrancesco CaciJan 10, 2005 9:38 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] is it possible to set MED on a default route ?Actions...
From:Manoj koshti (mano@yahoo.com)
Date:Jan 6, 2005 3:29:07 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Fo out going traffic from customer .

1.Provide can send MED to customer . 2.Customer can set Local Pref or weight.

for Incoming traffic . 1.Provide can ask customer to send MED or Community . 2.Customer can announce routes wilh AS path prepend.

Manoj

Pierfrancesco Caci <p.c@seabone.net> wrote:

Hello, I have a customer that is asking for 2 circuits to be configured as main and protection. They also asked for the default route to be announced over BGP, and they have another provider that I know nothing of.

The situation is more or less this:

Work My-router-A --------| Customer ----- Other transit My-router-B --------| Prot

Now, for what they announce to me, they can set a MED on the outgoing route-map and it will just work.

But for what I announce to them, if they lower the localpref on the protection circuit, in case of fault all traffic will go to the other transit. As I am announcing them only the default route, can they set different MEDs on these 2 defaults in their inbound route-map ?

Pf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pierfrancesco Caci | Network & System Administrator - INOC-DBA: 6762*PFC p.c@seabone.net | Telecom Italia Sparkle - http://etabeta.noc.seabone.net/ Linux paperino 2.4.20 #1 Mon Dec 2 17:02:14 CET 2002 i686 GNU/Linux