11 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Catalyst SX GBIC's and SMF
FromSent OnAttachments
Robert WaltonJan 7, 2005 3:11 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 7, 2005 3:36 am 
Justin M. StreinerJan 7, 2005 12:28 pm 
Lindahl, CarlJan 7, 2005 12:36 pm 
Tim WindersJan 7, 2005 1:54 pm 
Tristan GulyasJan 10, 2005 5:15 am 
Church, ChuckJan 10, 2005 8:39 am 
Niels BakkerJan 10, 2005 8:58 am 
Bill WichersJan 10, 2005 1:16 pm 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 10, 2005 3:51 pm 
Bill WichersJan 10, 2005 4:59 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] Catalyst SX GBIC's and SMFActions...
From:Bill Wichers (bil@waveform.net)
Date:Jan 10, 2005 4:59:36 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Bill Wichers wrote:

You should be safe using LX optics over multimode fiber. Mode conditioning

The original poster wanted to know if SX optics over SM fiber was ok (as stated in the topic).

Yes, I saw that just after writing and sending the first reply, unfortunatly.

A similar question was asked here several months ago, and I replied to that one and will just summarize here... SX optics are *not* repliable over singlemode fiber since they will not couple in enough light to work reliably. I have seen it work over short distances, but would not recommend it in a production network nor would I expect it to even come close to the published distances SX will work over MMF.

The problems come from the SX optics being designed to couple light into a much larger aperature (50-62.5 um) than SMF has (9-10 um). There are some other issues from LED instead of laser light propagation in the fiber, but the aperature size is a killer for performance in this case.

-Bill

***************************** Waveform Technology UNIX Systems Administrator