| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Gromov | Nov 22, 2011 2:56 pm | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 22, 2011 11:31 pm | |
| Paul King | Nov 23, 2011 12:03 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 1:10 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 1:46 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 2:06 am | |
| Tim Yates | Nov 24, 2011 2:13 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 2:24 am | |
| Rémi Forax | Nov 24, 2011 2:26 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 2:37 am | |
| Tim Yates | Nov 24, 2011 2:40 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 2:47 am | |
| Paul King | Nov 24, 2011 3:17 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 3:22 am | |
| Paul King | Nov 24, 2011 3:27 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 3:28 am | |
| Paul King | Nov 24, 2011 3:32 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 4:42 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 5:21 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 5:28 am | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 6:00 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 6:40 am | |
| Paul King | Nov 24, 2011 11:37 am | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 24, 2011 11:56 am | |
| Cédric Champeau | Nov 24, 2011 12:05 pm | |
| Paul King | Nov 24, 2011 2:17 pm | |
| Jochen Theodorou | Nov 24, 2011 3:58 pm | |
| Johannes Link | Nov 24, 2011 11:02 pm | |
| Peter Gromov | Nov 25, 2011 1:27 am | |
| Dinko Srkoc | Nov 25, 2011 1:47 am | |
| Johannes Link | Nov 25, 2011 1:49 am | |
| Dinko Srkoc | Nov 25, 2011 2:08 am | |
| Paul King | Nov 26, 2011 4:45 am | |
| Dierk König | Nov 26, 2011 6:13 am | |
| Johannes Link | Nov 26, 2011 6:26 am |
| Subject: | Re: [groovy-dev] Groovy collections determinism | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jochen Theodorou (blac...@gmx.org) | |
| Date: | Nov 24, 2011 1:46:24 am | |
| List: | org.codehaus.groovy.dev | |
Am 24.11.2011 10:10, schrieb Peter Gromov:
Well, it should not be hard to imagine a program where order matters, or not? In my case it's natural language processing, where every word has several meanings and some of them are more probable than others. And I definitely want to try them first, even after some filtering and intermediate processing. It happens so that this processing is quite complex and involves many collection transformations. And having to write 'as LinkedHashSet' or 'as List' at least once in every such transformation doesn't quite encourage me :)
As I said, I don't see how defaulting to LinkedHashSet and LinkedHashMap could break anything. And it would make at least me much happier with Groovy :)
Peter, do you have a real life program showing the problem?
bye blackdrag
-- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:





