atom feed19 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hardwareRe: supermicro p6sns/p6sas
FromSent OnAttachments
Craig JohnstonMay 16, 1997 12:42 pm 
Tom JacksonSep 26, 1997 12:30 pm 
Tony KimballSep 26, 1997 1:07 pm 
Tom JacksonSep 27, 1997 8:40 pm 
Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.comSep 27, 1997 10:16 pm 
Sean Eric FaganSep 27, 1997 10:35 pm 
Tony KimballSep 28, 1997 3:21 pm 
TomSep 28, 1997 7:57 pm 
Ben BryanSep 28, 1997 8:49 pm 
Tony KimballSep 29, 1997 8:04 am 
TomSep 29, 1997 10:55 am 
Tony KimballSep 29, 1997 11:13 am 
KedarSep 29, 1997 11:27 am 
John T. FarmerSep 29, 1997 11:08 pm 
TomSep 29, 1997 11:49 pm 
Doug RussellSep 30, 1997 12:35 am 
John T. FarmerSep 30, 1997 5:57 am 
Tony KimballSep 30, 1997 8:57 am 
NarviSep 30, 1997 1:02 pm 
Subject:Re: supermicro p6sns/p6sas
From:John T. Farmer (jfar@sabre.goldsword.com)
Date:Sep 29, 1997 11:08:05 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hardware

On Sun, 28 Sep 1997 19:58:04 -0700 (PDT) Tom said: [stuff deleted]

Why is it clear that socket 7 has superior life expentency to socket 8? Socket 8 is better (better bandwidth) than socket 7, so why doesn't AMD just make socket 8 processors rather than messing around trying to sqeeze more out of socket 7? I agree with Michael. AMD/Cyrix is targetting the secondary market, otherwise they'd be cranking out processors to use with the faster socket 8.

Also, you can use socket 8 processors in a slot 1 with an adapter. I have no idea why AMD isn't exploiting this to put CPUs onto slot 1 motherboards now.

The reason for AMD & Cyrix _not_ making a slot-1 is the same reason that they don't make socket-8 cpu's, namely, patents. Intel holds patents on both socket-8 and slot-1. Want to bet that they have/will have a patent on the slot-2 architecture also?

Ah, for the days when socket formats/designs were open, set by industry coalitions or organizations. When manufactours designed a "closed" socket & watched their design-in wins drop...

John