atom feed14 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] multiple instances of pd on ...
FromSent OnAttachments
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 28, 2008 1:45 am 
Steffen JuulJan 28, 2008 2:33 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 28, 2008 2:39 am 
Markus NoisternigJan 28, 2008 2:58 am 
Steffen JuulJan 28, 2008 3:41 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 28, 2008 4:06 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 28, 2008 4:07 am 
Steffen JuulJan 28, 2008 4:27 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 28, 2008 5:12 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 28, 2008 12:05 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 29, 2008 12:10 am 
Steffen JuulJan 29, 2008 6:56 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 29, 2008 8:02 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigJan 29, 2008 8:06 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] multiple instances of pd on os-x
From:Steffen Juul (stf@dibidut.dk)
Date:Jan 29, 2008 6:56:40 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

On 29/01/2008, at 9.11, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/MacOS/Pd-extended

interesting. any ideas why it does not work for steffen?

I tried out Pd-0.41-0. Hans tried Pd-extended. Pd-0.41-0 is build by Miller. Pd-extended is build by Hans. While it's still on the same operation system, it's not the same build system. I think the differentness is in how the GUI and the core of Pd are tied to each other.

I still haven't worked out how Miller builds on Mac OS X, i.e. makes a so called "app bundle". It's not a matter of just running './ configure & make & make install' since the install makefile target doesn't make a app bundle. - In fact that operation is nowhere mentioned in the Makefile that ships with the src.

I'm not saying this to just cough up shit. But to say that the way Pd- extended is build for Mac OS X might be more in the Mac way of doing things. That is that running /path/to/some.app/Contents/MacOS/ executable might even be the default or standard way of launching an application (on Mac OS X). But again i'm no Mac witch.