Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Ilan Berkner | Mar 29, 2009 3:59 pm | |
| Kiril Angov | Mar 29, 2009 4:56 pm | |
| Cliff Wells | Mar 29, 2009 8:29 pm | |
| Chris Zimmerman | Mar 29, 2009 9:10 pm | |
| russlndr | Apr 12, 2009 8:17 pm | |
| CryptWizard | Apr 12, 2009 10:54 pm | |
| jeff emminger | Apr 13, 2009 6:34 am | |
| russlndr | Apr 13, 2009 7:04 am | |
| Barry Abrahamson | Apr 14, 2009 8:59 am | |
| Victor Iggy | Apr 14, 2009 3:55 pm | |
| Barry Abrahamson | Apr 14, 2009 7:12 pm | |
| Floren Munteanu | Apr 14, 2009 8:39 pm | |
| Victor Iggy | Apr 15, 2009 10:43 am | |
| Barry Abrahamson | Apr 15, 2009 12:14 pm | |
| zepolen | Apr 15, 2009 5:58 pm | |
| Phillip B Oldham | Apr 16, 2009 12:20 am | |
| Barry Abrahamson | Apr 16, 2009 7:47 am | |
| Barry Abrahamson | Apr 16, 2009 7:52 am | |
| zepolen | Apr 17, 2009 1:59 pm |
| Subject: | Re: varnish? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Barry Abrahamson (bar...@automattic.com) | |
| Date: | Apr 15, 2009 12:14:03 pm | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Victor Iggy wrote:
@Barry Abrahamson
Sorry, I should of been more specific. I also follow the varnish-misc list, and I have read that gravatar uses varnish specifically for their thumbnails. That is what I meant by static data. So the question still stands, won't it make more sense to avoid the double buffer problem and just use filesystem cache?
Yes, except the vast majority images are generated dynamically, so they don't exist on a filesystem anywhere :)
-- Barry Abrahamson | Systems Wrangler | Automattic Blog: http://barry.wordpress.com





