On Mar 4, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
: A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
: that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
I still don't like that we're voting on a "Goal"
I don't quite understand what you mean here. As I read it, the proposal from Michael is pretty specific on details.
I still think that we should approach something like this iteratively and
incrementally -- preferably starting with some basic refactoring/merging
of specific components/modules (akin to McCandless'ss original suggestion)
and adjusting committers/mailinglists/build-processes however it makes
sense as we go along.
I just don't see how specific components will work. Say we spin out analyzers but Solr doesn't move up to 3.0.x immediately. What incentive is there for a Solr committer to work on a new Analyzer in the Analyzers project as opposed to Solr?