 | Start a set with this search |
 | Include this search in one of my sets |
 | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
 | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
 | Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
15 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] 3550 QoS not working as expected| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Tim Devries | Jan 6, 2005 12:14 pm | |
| Nick Shah | Jan 6, 2005 5:39 pm | |
| Tim Devries | Jan 6, 2005 6:21 pm | |
| Nick Shah | Jan 6, 2005 6:58 pm | |
| Tim Devries | Jan 6, 2005 7:27 pm | |
| Nick Shah | Jan 6, 2005 7:51 pm | |
| Tim Devries | Jan 6, 2005 8:24 pm | |
| Sam Stickland | Jan 6, 2005 8:49 pm | |
| Tim Devries | Jan 6, 2005 9:28 pm | |
| McCallum, Robert | Jan 7, 2005 3:49 am | |
| Dmitry Valdov | Jan 7, 2005 4:03 am | |
| McCallum, Robert | Jan 7, 2005 4:05 am | |
| WILDE, David | Jan 7, 2005 4:25 am | |
| Nick Shah | Jan 9, 2005 4:10 am | |
| Tim Devries | Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am |
| Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [c-nsp] 3550 QoS not working as expected | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Nick Shah (Nick...@aapt.com.au) | |
| Date: | Jan 6, 2005 6:58:47 pm | |
| List: | net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp | |
Tim
Sorry, you don't _have_to use aggregate policer. You could.
Is there any non-ip traffic ? If so, You can create an extra match, and then use an aggregate policer to police it at 3MB. I would also change the IP ACL 102 to match ip any any, just to test it.
mls qos aggregate-policer fas0-01-ipolicer 3000000 8000 exceed-action drop
class-map match-all MATCH-MAC match access-group name MAC-ACL
mac access-list extended MAC-ACL permit any any
policy-map customerA class customerA police aggregate fas0-01-ipolicer class MATCH-MAC police aggregate fas0-01-ipolicer
Rgds
Nick
--------------------------------------------------------------- Well, this is my current config:
Mls qos ! class-map match-all customerA match access-group 102 ! ! policy-map customerA class customerA police 3000000 8000 exceed-action drop ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 description CustomerA - 3MB/s switchport access vlan 4 switchport mode access switchport protected bandwidth 3000 mls qos monitor packets service-policy history service-policy input customerA no cdp enable spanning-tree portfast ! access-list 102 permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.15 any
I made some changes through the day like applying it ingress w/ access-list etc., however, it still spikes up to 5-6Mb. In all of the documentation I've read, I didn't see anything regarding the aggregate as being a necessary configuration step. I guess I'm wondering if it should work without an aggregate policer, because at least with this IOS version and my current configuration it doesn't.
When I do a
Colo-3550#sh mls qos int fa0/1 stat FastEthernet0/1 Ingress dscp: incoming no_change classified policed dropped (in pkts) Others: 38469779 38379716 90063 0 190138 Egress dscp: incoming no_change classified policed dropped (in pkts) Others: 33285081 n/a n/a 0 0
Colo-3550#
I see packets being dropped, but in my monitoring software I still see it spiking up to 5-6Mb.
Thanks,
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------