atom feed23 messages in org.apache.ant.userRE: Building a hierarcical build-file...
FromSent OnAttachments
schmittOct 17, 2000 7:13 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 17, 2000 7:30 am 
Dino ValenteOct 17, 2000 8:19 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 17, 2000 8:34 am 
Craig R. McClanahanOct 17, 2000 8:44 am 
George McKInneyOct 17, 2000 8:44 am 
Mahlen MorrisOct 17, 2000 8:51 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 17, 2000 8:52 am 
Dino ValenteOct 17, 2000 9:06 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 17, 2000 9:21 am 
Craig R. McClanahanOct 17, 2000 9:55 am 
Dan SmithOct 17, 2000 10:11 am 
Chris ToddOct 17, 2000 5:24 pm 
Chris ToddOct 17, 2000 6:11 pm 
Diane HoltOct 17, 2000 10:48 pm 
Stefan BodewigOct 17, 2000 11:50 pm 
Stefan BodewigOct 18, 2000 12:53 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 18, 2000 1:10 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 18, 2000 1:34 am 
Douglas GuptillOct 18, 2000 1:48 pm 
Stefan BodewigOct 19, 2000 4:30 am 
Dino ValenteOct 20, 2000 7:55 am 
Stefan BodewigOct 20, 2000 7:58 am 
Subject:RE: Building a hierarcical build-file tree?
From:George McKInney (geo@tantalus.com)
Date:Oct 17, 2000 8:44:45 am
List:org.apache.ant.user

"s" == schmitt <3155@gmx.net> writes:

s> Is this possible and if, how?

It is possible (calling buildX.xml from control.xml via <ant> for example) but I wouldn't recommend a design like this. IMHO building different modules by different targets in the same build file works better.

If you've got the time, would you outline the reasons for your opinion?

(Just don't let it distract you from the 1.2 release :-)

Thanks,

George McKinney, Developer tantalus communications inc. 500-1122 Mainland Street Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 5L1 geo@tantalus.com

Direct 604.726.6753 Main 604.609.0700 Fax 604.609.0705 www.tantalus.com "When eBusiness experience counts."