atom feed28 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-smpRe: Stepping on Toes
FromSent OnAttachments
Matthew DillonJun 23, 2000 11:36 am 
David GreenmanJun 24, 2000 9:10 pm 
Matthew DillonJun 25, 2000 10:24 am 
Jake BurkholderJun 25, 2000 11:19 am 
Chuck PatersonJun 26, 2000 9:50 am 
Matthew DillonJun 27, 2000 10:41 am 
Chuck PatersonJun 27, 2000 11:19 am 
Kevin Van MarenJun 29, 2000 1:52 pm 
Greg LeheyJul 2, 2000 6:51 pm 
Jason EvansJul 3, 2000 8:41 am 
Jake BurkholderJul 3, 2000 1:14 pm 
Jake BurkholderJul 5, 2000 2:23 am 
Matthew DillonJul 5, 2000 9:43 am 
Chuck PatersonJul 5, 2000 9:52 am 
Chuck PatersonJul 5, 2000 9:57 am 
Luoqi ChenJul 5, 2000 10:29 am 
Matthew DillonJul 5, 2000 11:28 am 
Greg LeheyJul 5, 2000 4:20 pm 
Doug RabsonJul 6, 2000 1:26 am 
Matthew DillonJul 6, 2000 10:43 am 
Greg LeheyJul 22, 2000 2:26 am 
Matthew DillonJul 22, 2000 9:20 am 
Chuck PatersonJul 22, 2000 9:57 am 
Bruce EvansJul 22, 2000 10:36 am 
Greg LeheyJul 23, 2000 8:14 pm 
Bruce EvansJul 24, 2000 1:08 am 
Chuck PatersonJul 24, 2000 6:43 am 
Matthew DillonJul 24, 2000 9:16 am 
Subject:Re: Stepping on Toes
From:Chuck Paterson (cp@bsdi.com)
Date:Jun 27, 2000 11:19:16 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-smp

} } Yes, I see it. I agree. You don't even need to hold a scheduling } lock... all you need to hold is Giant.

Sorry, I wasn't real clear. I didn't mean to imply that it was necessary to hold the scheduling lock in unsafe code. It is necessary to have a scheduling lock to protect the run queues and friends.

Chuck

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message