Aleksander Adamowski writes:
Hi!
I have a question to Mr. Sam.
Suppose that I'd implement support for dynamic mail aliases in
ldapaliasd, what chance would that have of being checked in?
What requirements would a patch have to meet (e.g. comments/code ratio,
indenting style etc.)?
I'm thinking of adding code in ldapaliasd that would support dynamic
mail aliases similar to e.g. those in Netscape Messaging Server.
I'm not familiar with the term “dynamic mail aliases”; I'm also not familiar
with NMS.
Perhaps you can explain what you're trying to do.