18 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Cisco 7304 as a Border router
FromSent OnAttachments
Robert BlayzorJan 14, 2005 10:30 am 
McCallum, RobertJan 14, 2005 10:39 am 
Clinton WorkJan 14, 2005 1:03 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 14, 2005 1:44 pm 
Mark PriorJan 15, 2005 12:24 am 
Majid FaridJan 15, 2005 4:59 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 5:27 am 
sth...@nethelp.noJan 15, 2005 9:03 am 
Robert BlayzorJan 15, 2005 10:15 am 
Mark PriorJan 15, 2005 11:25 pm 
sth...@nethelp.noJan 16, 2005 12:17 am 
Majid FaridJan 16, 2005 2:23 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 16, 2005 2:31 am 
McCallum, RobertJan 16, 2005 5:01 pm 
Majid FaridJan 17, 2005 12:12 pm 
Kevin GrahamJan 17, 2005 9:36 pm 
McCallum, RobertJan 18, 2005 4:59 am 
Simon LeinenJan 21, 2005 3:20 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] Cisco 7304 as a Border routerActions...
From:Mikael Abrahamsson (swm@swm.pp.se)
Date:Jan 15, 2005 5:27:42 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Majid Farid wrote:

I am running 4 7304's with NSE-100. They are good routers the only issue we have encountered so far is IOS train is still pretty buggy. We have done upgrades twice last year due to different bug and another one is due now. The bandwidth test we did using IXIA we did were not bad. If I

We have also had quite a lot of problems with the NSE-100 and have gone through more software versions than you have... We're currently at 12.2.20S6 which seems to work well.

remember correctly we stared to see 4% packet lost at around 800mbps witn 64 bytes packet size. Also I have no issues running BGP full routes on them.

Could you please describe more in depth how this test was done? The information I have is that the NSE-100 should be able to do 3.5Mpps non-blocking which should be more than you're seeing...

-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm@swm.pp.se