atom feed8 messages in net.java.dev.spots.devRe: proposed I2C interface
FromSent OnAttachments
Ron GoldmanDec 13, 2008 2:52 pm 
Eric ArseneauDec 13, 2008 3:57 pm 
Ron GoldmanDec 13, 2008 4:21 pm 
Robert AlkireDec 13, 2008 6:41 pm 
David G. SimmonsDec 13, 2008 7:00 pm 
Ron GoldmanDec 13, 2008 7:05 pm 
Ron GoldmanDec 13, 2008 7:57 pm 
David G. SimmonsDec 14, 2008 6:09 am 
Subject:Re: proposed I2C interface
From:Ron Goldman (Ron.@sun.com)
Date:Dec 13, 2008 7:05:54 pm
List:net.java.dev.spots.dev

On Dec 13, 2008, at 7:01 PM, David G. Simmons wrote:

I'd actually like to see the TWI stay in the method names. openTWI(), closeTWI(), readTWI() and writeTWI() instead of just open() close() read() write(). Likewise probeTWI() and isTWIBusy()

I think it makes it more clear to us idiot-users what, exactly, we're doing.

David,

Yeah I considered that, but since the calls will need an II2C instance what you'll see is:

II2C i2c = Spot.getInstance().getI2C();

i2c.open(); i2c.read(temp, data, 0, 1);

etc. Does that seem enough context? Or do you still want the I2C in the method name?

-- Ron --

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-@spots.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: dev-@spots.dev.java.net