De: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoe...@iem.at> Asunto: Re: [PD] d_fat extension ??? A: "Andres Ferrari" <anf...@yahoo.com> Cc: pd-l...@iem.at Fecha: domingo, 19 julio, 2009, 7:05 am Andres Ferrari wrote:

"d" is for darwin, "fat" is for universal binaries. there are alternative extensions like "d_ppc" (guess what).

it's just an filename-extension, otherwise it is identical to the old extensions (but it is useful if you want to have several architecture binaries living side-by-side)

what is the exact error message? is it not able to find the files or can it not dlopen them? (use "-verbose") iirc, hans has expressed his dislike of .d_fat in favour of .pd_darwin, but i don't think he would have actively removed support for .d_fat.

however, if this _is_ the problem, just renaming .d_fat to .pd_darwin should fix it (and bugger hans to remain compatible with pd-vanilla :-)) (i'm pretty sure that on 0.40 you already should have support for .d_fat)

if it finds the file but cannot dlopen, then the file is probably NOT a fat binary (despite it's name) and rather compiled for a wrong architecture.

fgmasdr IOhannes