Thanks for your response Patrick

That is good to know. We can use the CIQ list to update you all on our
activities and show early drafts and so on, to make sure we don't head off on
some tangent that is at odds with where the rest of the world is trending
towards.

Cheers Colin

From: Patrick Lam [mailto:pl...@mastersoftgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 7:30 p.m. To: Colin Wallis; ci...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: XPRL adoption

Hi Colin,

We are a Data Quality software vendor from Australia and also have presence in
New Zealand; we use CIQ xAL / xNL to represent Name and Address, and xPRL to
represent relationships in the software, both as a way for modules to
communicate with each other internally as well as for processing output
purposes.

Thanks and regards, Patrick

Patrick Lam | Product Architect - Mastersoft | +61 2 9270 3120 (o) | + 61 404
039 778 (m)

________________________________ From: Colin Wallis [mailto:Coli...@dia.govt.nz] Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 2:38 PM To: ci...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ciq] XPRL adoption

Greetings all

Here in NZ Gov we have developed a fairly basic (so far) data model for roles
and relationships that we now want to map CIQ XPRL onto.

But as matter of interest we just wanted to check if anyone can point us to
other XPRL adoptions around the world.

A Google search points to its consideration by W3C of Emergency Mgt info Stds,
and a couple of other instances..but none that I can directly connect to TC
folks..

There's numerous references to adoption of XAL and XNL, but less on XPRL...

Thanks Colin