atom feed27 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld;...
FromSent OnAttachments
Shawn BarnhartJul 17, 2000 7:26 am 
Walter CampbellJul 17, 2000 7:33 am 
David UhringJul 17, 2000 1:40 pm 
Shawn BarnhartJul 17, 2000 2:19 pm 
Cyrille LefevreJul 17, 2000 2:22 pm 
Richard StanafordJul 17, 2000 3:37 pm 
ChrisJul 17, 2000 4:24 pm 
Kent StewartJul 17, 2000 4:29 pm 
Chad R. LarsonJul 17, 2000 5:01 pm 
R Joseph WrightJul 17, 2000 5:36 pm 
Kent StewartJul 17, 2000 6:29 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesJul 17, 2000 6:51 pm 
Richard StanafordJul 17, 2000 7:01 pm 
David UhringJul 17, 2000 7:08 pm 
Shawn BarnhartJul 17, 2000 9:09 pm 
R Joseph WrightJul 17, 2000 11:04 pm 
Kevin ObermanJul 18, 2000 8:02 am 
Mario Sergio Fujikawa FerreiraJul 19, 2000 1:04 pm 
Shawn BarnhartJul 19, 2000 1:34 pm 
Kent StewartJul 19, 2000 1:43 pm 
Mike MuirJul 19, 2000 3:47 pm 
Mike HoskinsJul 19, 2000 6:32 pm 
Mario Sergio Fujikawa FerreiraJul 20, 2000 5:50 am 
Jeffrey J. MountinJul 21, 2000 11:34 am 
Rodney W. GrimesJul 21, 2000 12:52 pm 
Jeffrey J. MountinJul 22, 2000 3:17 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesJul 22, 2000 5:32 pm 
Subject:Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what?
From:Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira (lio@uol.com.br)
Date:Jul 20, 2000 5:50:18 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:34:16PM -0500, Shawn Barnhart wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" <lio@uol.com.br> To: <free@FreeBSD.ORG>

| Before blaming freebsd, either sigbus errors or | signal 11 should be checked for either bad hardware or memory.

season on -STABLE. I was ALREADY assuming broken hardware, and was surprised that the pounding the machine got under Windows didn't reveal any problems.

Sorry. I was not being harsh. I keep forgetting that emails do not convey emotion unless I put some smily faces. :)

From my original message:

(As an aside, I was checking for info on my board, an Asus TXP4, on USENET and supposedly it will do an unadvertised 75 and 83Mhz FSB. Anyone know how overclockable K6-233 CPUs are?)

Close to none. The bus should be the last thing you touch when overclocking because it can cause all kind of trouble. However, I am no expert though using k6s for the past 2 years. My experience is that they get really unstable with more than 50 Mhz overclock due to temperature restrictions specially (high voltage). The k6-2, k6-3 and k6-2+ should be better suitable for overclocking in this particular order. You should consult http://www.tomshardware.com/ for a complete overclocking guide IMHO.

Regards, Mario Ferreira

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message