Messages per Month
|Chiusano Joseph||May 25, 2004 6:05 am|
|David RR Webber||May 25, 2004 6:11 am|
|Matthew MacKenzie||May 25, 2004 11:19 am|
|Matthew MacKenzie||May 25, 2004 11:21 am|
|David RR Webber||May 25, 2004 2:43 pm|
|Duane Nickull||May 26, 2004 1:13 am|
|Matthew MacKenzie||May 26, 2004 5:11 am|
|David RR Webber||May 26, 2004 6:43 am|
|Subject:||RE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns|
|From:||Matthew MacKenzie (mat...@adobe.com)|
|Date:||May 26, 2004 5:11:35 am|
The point of what I am doing is to specify a pattern with various views. I am not ruling out BPSS or UML as part of one of those views.
Architecture has to be of interest to both the builder and the patron.
-----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber [mailto:dav...@drrw.info] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 4:48 PM To: Matthew MacKenzie; 'Chiusano Joseph'; 'ebSOA' Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
Sounds like you are drinking the BCM Kool-Aid here! ; -)
BCM definately talks about the business way to go after finding patterns - while how to define those patterns is left as an exercise to the reader - domain specific.
If we are going after an illustrative approach here - that's a bit more formal than just using PPT to draw boxes and lines - then I can grok that, eh?!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew MacKenzie" <mat...@adobe.com> To: "'Chiusano Joseph'" <chiu...@bah.com>; "'ebSOA'" <ebs...@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:25 PM Subject: RE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
Take a look at what I am proposing in the latest draft. Its not so much a pattern language as a template for describing the abstract patterns we are addressing.
-----Original Message----- From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiu...@bah.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:09 AM To: ebSOA Subject: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
I'm taking a step back and re-examining our discussions on patterns that have occurred over the past several weeks, and have some questions please:
(1) I know we've said that we've decided that we would create a pattern language - is that what we *really* want? Is it too low-level (i.e. toward assembly language) for the purposes of this TC? Patterns can be conveyed without the use of a pattern language, as IBM does in their SOA Patterns redbook.
(2) What are some examples of existing pattern languages? I did not see any glaring references in any of the e-mail threads.
-- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton