19 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] 12.0.28S (NPE-150) (was "12.0...
FromSent OnAttachments
Brian FeenyJan 7, 2005 12:23 pm 
Dave TemkinJan 7, 2005 12:32 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 7, 2005 12:43 pm 
Brian FeenyJan 7, 2005 12:46 pm 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 8, 2005 1:52 am 
RoyJan 8, 2005 2:33 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 9, 2005 1:04 am 
Gert DoeringJan 9, 2005 1:09 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 10, 2005 3:59 pm 
RoyJan 10, 2005 7:46 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 11, 2005 11:47 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 12, 2005 1:03 am 
Gert DoeringJan 12, 2005 2:46 am 
Rodney DunnJan 12, 2005 8:27 am 
Rodney DunnJan 12, 2005 8:32 am 
Gert DoeringJan 12, 2005 8:50 am 
RoyJan 12, 2005 10:12 am 
Rodney DunnJan 12, 2005 10:46 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 12, 2005 4:55 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] 12.0.28S (NPE-150) (was "12.0.30S")Actions...
From:Brian Feeny (sig@shreve.net)
Date:Jan 7, 2005 12:46:43 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Ok, well I made a mistake it would seem that 12.0.28 was the last version of 12.0S that supported the NPE-150.

So its comments on 12.0.28S / 12.0S trains running on NPE-150's I am fishing for.

Thanks,

Brian

On Jan 7, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:

Been using it for a couple of weeks for AToM/L2TpV3 traffic w/ ISIS and it's been stable.

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Brian Feeny wrote:

Can anyone comment on the stability of 12.0.30S?

Anyone using it? If not, which 12.0S code are you deploying?

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------

------ Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP e: sig@shreve.net Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709 ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612

------------------------------------------------------------------------