atom feed40 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: nvi maintainer?
FromSent OnAttachments
Will AndrewsJul 8, 2001 1:19 am 
Peter WemmJul 8, 2001 2:37 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 7:25 am 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 8, 2001 7:34 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 8:25 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 8:25 am 
Justin T. GibbsJul 8, 2001 8:31 am 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 8, 2001 8:37 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 9:06 am 
Ben SmithurstJul 8, 2001 9:09 am 
scan...@jurai.netJul 8, 2001 9:09 am 
Matthew D. FullerJul 8, 2001 12:56 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 8:13 pm 
Steve KarglJul 8, 2001 9:24 pm 
Wes PetersJul 8, 2001 9:28 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:31 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:34 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:36 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:38 pm 
Mike SmithJul 8, 2001 9:42 pm 
Wes PetersJul 8, 2001 9:45 pm 
Joseph MallettJul 8, 2001 11:23 pm 
Joseph MallettJul 8, 2001 11:25 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 11:39 pm 
Wes PetersJul 9, 2001 12:10 am 
Bernd WalterJul 9, 2001 6:07 am 
Bill FennerJul 9, 2001 11:16 am 
GHJul 9, 2001 2:46 pm 
TimJul 9, 2001 7:29 pm.maze4vi, .Other
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 10, 2001 2:28 pm 
Bill FennerJul 10, 2001 2:38 pm 
Matt DillonJul 10, 2001 3:42 pm 
David O'BrienJul 10, 2001 3:48 pm 
Matt DillonJul 10, 2001 4:06 pm 
ar...@FreeBSD.ORGJul 10, 2001 4:10 pm 
Matt DillonJul 10, 2001 4:19 pm 
Keith BosticJul 10, 2001 6:18 pm 
Garance A DrosihnJul 10, 2001 6:18 pm 
Jason EvansJul 10, 2001 6:32 pm 
Brian F. FeldmanJul 11, 2001 10:17 am 
Subject:Re: nvi maintainer?
From:Brian F. Feldman (gre@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Jul 11, 2001 10:17:30 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

Jason Evans <jas@canonware.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:18:26PM -0400, Keith Bostic wrote:

I think that FreeBSD should leave DB 1.85 in the C library, and when (if?) nvi finally upgrades to DB 3, simply load nvi & DB 3 as a single executable and ship it that way. Problem solved. :-)

I think most people have dropped out of the conversation at this point, having realized that your above suggestion is a perfectly acceptable way of proceeding.

Let the editor wars[*] continue.

[*]: Emacs does the dishes for you!

Let's just plan on doing that, then. It wasn't said that libc HAD to contain a new version of DB, since nvi will, when it depends on DB3, be using the new interface anyway. So that leaves us with the situation that we have the same old DB in libc, plus all the bugfixes for it we accumulate (because it's certainly true that we are continuing to maintain it to this day), so noone is surprised there, and adding DB3 to our libraries, separately.

The sheer number of people that would hate any switch in the base system's vi to another that didn't work in exactly the same way is much larger than anyone likely can estimate.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message