| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rory Walsh | Feb 5, 2009 9:46 am | .pd |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 5, 2009 9:51 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 6, 2009 1:51 am | |
| Chris McCormick | Feb 6, 2009 5:13 am | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 6, 2009 2:07 pm | |
| Claude Heiland-Allen | Feb 6, 2009 4:04 pm | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 6, 2009 5:28 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 7, 2009 3:31 am | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 8, 2009 6:13 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 9, 2009 12:47 am | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 9, 2009 3:18 am | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 9, 2009 4:33 am | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 9, 2009 5:30 am | |
| Matt Barber | Feb 9, 2009 12:00 pm | |
| Jonathan Wilkes | Feb 9, 2009 1:45 pm | |
| Jonathan Wilkes | Feb 9, 2009 2:17 pm | |
| Mike McGonagle | Feb 9, 2009 2:43 pm | |
| Phil Stone | Feb 9, 2009 3:50 pm | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 9, 2009 3:52 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 9, 2009 10:57 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 10, 2009 2:02 am | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 10, 2009 3:50 am | |
| Phil Stone | Feb 10, 2009 7:29 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 8:37 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 8:45 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 8:56 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 10, 2009 8:59 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 9:05 am | |
| Jack | Feb 10, 2009 9:18 am | |
| Chris McCormick | Feb 10, 2009 9:20 am | |
| Phil Stone | Feb 10, 2009 9:30 am | |
| Matt Barber | Feb 10, 2009 9:36 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 9:50 am | |
| IOhannes m zmölnig | Feb 10, 2009 10:22 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] here I go again..dynamic abstractions | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | zmoe...@iem.at (zmoe...@iem.at) | |
| Date: | Feb 9, 2009 3:18:12 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
Quoting "Georg Werner" <geo...@fricklr.de>:
Hi,
i mean message boxes. i think there is the misunderstanding. you dont send $1 as a message, too. not as message nor creation argument.
ok.
i am only trying to explain why it is like it is without resorting to implementation-issues, but instead based on a more conceptual basis (which i don't have any guarantee to be true, since i have not designed the system; this is my view of the world i have come up with after a long time of paptching)
to reiterate:
a message-box works only on messages. a message-box is only a way to "freeze" a message in time (it's hard to patch messages that only exist in an instant of time otherwise). it is concerned only with messages!
$-args in message-boxes are a way to modify messages. since messages don't have a patch-context, neither have (their patchable instances) message-boxes.
mfgasd IOhannes
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Pd-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list






.pd