atom feed34 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
FromSent OnAttachments
Peter BurdenMar 18, 2008 5:01 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 8:17 am 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 8:48 am 
Ben KennedyMar 18, 2008 12:00 pm 
Aidas KasparasMar 18, 2008 12:13 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:43 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:56 pm 
Norbert SchmidtMar 18, 2008 1:22 pm 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 5:55 pm 
Jerry AmundsonMar 19, 2008 9:58 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 19, 2008 11:47 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 12:02 am 
Aidas KasparasMar 20, 2008 2:19 am 
Peter BurdenMar 20, 2008 4:03 am 
EndaMar 20, 2008 4:44 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 4:47 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 20, 2008 9:04 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:56 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:57 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 12:22 am 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 2:14 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 3:20 pm 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 4:48 pm 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 9:27 pm 
Peter BurdenMay 12, 2008 9:06 am 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 15, 2008 10:53 am 
Peter BurdenMay 15, 2008 3:33 pm 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 16, 2008 2:49 am 
Peter BurdenJun 18, 2008 9:00 am 
Jeff JansenJun 18, 2008 5:45 pm 
Peter BurdenJun 19, 2008 1:56 pm 
Gordon MessmerJun 19, 2008 4:35 pm 
Jeff JansenJun 19, 2008 6:08 pm.patch
Peter BurdenJul 22, 2008 3:47 am 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
From:Gordon Messmer (yiny@eburg.com)
Date:Apr 23, 2008 9:27:00 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Peter Burden wrote:

I'm reworking the code that signs multipart messages. A test confirmed that it did sign text/plain attachments which is very wrong. The encapsulation you suggest would, I imagine, be multipart/related but I'd want to be sure that all likely mail clients handle this correctly.

I think you'd want multipart/mixed.