32 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: MFC of rcNG?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Doug Barton | Jun 15, 2002 12:14 pm | |
| Gordon Tetlow | Jun 16, 2002 9:58 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 16, 2002 11:01 am | |
| Julian Elischer | Jun 16, 2002 1:24 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 16, 2002 1:50 pm | |
| Nik Clayton | Jun 16, 2002 2:39 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 16, 2002 3:07 pm | |
| Mike Makonnen | Jun 17, 2002 2:10 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 17, 2002 2:32 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jun 17, 2002 9:01 am | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jun 17, 2002 11:48 am | |
| Mike Makonnen | Jun 17, 2002 4:51 pm | |
| Giorgos Keramidas | Jun 17, 2002 7:49 pm | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jun 18, 2002 1:29 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 18, 2002 2:06 am | |
| Mike Makonnen | Jun 18, 2002 5:04 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jun 18, 2002 5:21 am | |
| Trish Lynch | Jun 18, 2002 6:04 am | |
| Mike Makonnen | Jun 18, 2002 6:05 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jun 18, 2002 6:12 am | |
| Mike Makonnen | Jun 18, 2002 7:26 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 18, 2002 10:54 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jun 18, 2002 11:06 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 18, 2002 11:23 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jun 18, 2002 11:35 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 18, 2002 11:41 am | |
| Gordon Tetlow | Jun 18, 2002 12:53 pm | |
| Nik Clayton | Jun 18, 2002 2:40 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 18, 2002 3:17 pm | |
| Nik Clayton | Jun 18, 2002 3:27 pm | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jun 18, 2002 6:00 pm | |
| Julian Elischer | Jun 18, 2002 6:20 pm |
| Subject: | Re: MFC of rcNG? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Doug Barton (Dou...@FreeBSD.org) | |
| Date: | Jun 16, 2002 11:01:21 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
[Moved to -arch, since the cvs-* lists have suffered enough recently.]
Nik Clayton wrote:
And is this something that can be MFC'd? I realise it's quite a fundamental change to the startup system, but if it made it in to 4.7 as an alternative (so the default remains the same) it would give people the chance to try it out without needing to run -current. It also makes it more likely to be covered in the Handbook. . .
I vigorously oppose making it the default in 4.x at any time... we already did one major overhaul of /etc/rc* in RELENG_4, and I don't think we should put them through that again. However, if we can get it polished sufficiently I wouldn't object necessarily to having it in there as an option; BUT, I seriously doubt it'd get to that point in time to be useful.
The only MFC candidate I'd like to see is /etc/rc.subr. This would allow the ports collection to use the facilities provided by rcng while not making everything dependent on whether you are using CURRENT or STABLE.
Agreed on that point, we'll blow up the rest of the bridges when we get to them.
Is a version bump a good idea?
Version of what?
-- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message