|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 8, 2007 1:14 pm|
|jai-...@javadesktop.org||Jun 8, 2007 3:39 pm|
|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 8, 2007 5:23 pm|
|David Clunie||Jun 11, 2007 1:38 pm|
|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 11, 2007 1:58 pm|
|Marco Sambin - NeoLogica||Jun 12, 2007 1:01 am|
|robert engels||Jun 12, 2007 1:18 am|
|robert engels||Jun 12, 2007 1:19 am|
|David Clunie||Jun 12, 2007 5:24 pm|
|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 13, 2007 10:58 am|
|Marc Boscher||Jun 13, 2007 11:41 am|
|Rosati Claudio||Jun 13, 2007 10:51 pm|
|David Clunie||Jun 14, 2007 3:26 am|
|David Clunie||Jun 14, 2007 3:35 am|
|Bogdan Iamandei||Jun 14, 2007 4:08 am|
|David Clunie||Jun 14, 2007 9:43 am|
|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 14, 2007 5:50 pm|
|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 14, 2007 5:51 pm|
|Brian Burkhalter||Jun 14, 2007 5:54 pm|
|jai-...@javadesktop.org||Jul 17, 2007 6:58 am|
|Subject:||RE: [JAI-IMAGEIO] JAI Image I/O Tools is now available via Web Start|
|From:||Marc Boscher (mar...@digicharm.com)|
|Date:||Jun 13, 2007 11:41:23 am|
Just wanted to say that supporting MacOS X in the public JNLP is a requirement for us to actually use that jnlp. A separate jnlp for that would be fine. Supporting MacOS using a generic catchall <resource> would be even better.
In any case this will avoid the need to sign and jar the imageio libraries ourselves. This in turn will eliminate many of the legal ambiguity associated with this process and the imageio license.
So Mac support in the Sun-provided jnlp has my vote, whatever mechanism is used to do it!
Marc Boscher Communications Digicharm Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Bria...@Sun.COM [mailto:Bria...@Sun.COM] Sent: June 13, 2007 1:59 PM To: inte...@jai-imageio.dev.java.net Subject: Re: [JAI-IMAGEIO] JAI Image I/O Tools is now available via Web Start
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Clunie wrote:
Brian Burkhalter wrote:
BUT, it did not actually cause the jai_imageio.jar to be used to provide access to the JPEG 2000 codec.
That seems strange. What shows up in the javaws cache viewer?
It definitely loads and is visible in the cache viewer (and if I remove it, it reloads and again is visible - it just does not work).
I don't know enough about whether there is a difference in the way Web Start works on Mac OS X to be able to comment.
Regardless, can you put the Mac OS X entry of resource in the publicly accessible JNLP file ?
I am still thinking about it but it makes me a little uncomfortable. Would it be acceptable perhaps to create a different publicly accessible JNLP file for this purpose? Also, I was wondering if a generic <resource/> entry would work instead, i.e., one which did not specify OS and architecture? That would allow the default to apply to all non-specified platforms. This would need to be tested.
---------------- Brian Burkhalter Java Media, Imaging, and Graphics Sun Microsystems, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~