| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Wilson | Jan 7, 2003 8:47 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 9:08 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 7, 2003 9:14 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 9:26 am | |
| Kevin Wilson | Jan 7, 2003 9:33 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 9:41 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 7, 2003 10:00 am | |
| Rasputin | Jan 7, 2003 10:55 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 12:40 pm | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 12:47 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 7, 2003 12:58 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 1:50 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 7:15 am | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 12:54 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 12:55 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 1:03 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 1:34 pm | |
| Gary Gwin | Jan 8, 2003 2:34 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 2:46 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 3:24 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 3:44 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 3:51 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 3:55 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 5:33 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 6:06 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 6:28 pm | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 8, 2003 6:33 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 7:19 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 7:26 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 7:35 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:06 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:11 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:17 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:21 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 11:23 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:37 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 11:51 pm | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 12:03 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 9, 2003 12:08 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 2:31 am | |
| Ralph Einfeldt | Jan 9, 2003 2:41 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 3:51 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 3:53 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 5:22 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 5:33 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 10:01 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 10:02 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 11:16 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 11:25 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 9, 2003 11:43 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 11:47 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 12:09 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 12:11 pm | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 9, 2003 12:33 pm | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 1:41 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 1:45 pm | |
| Jon Eaves | Jan 9, 2003 2:58 pm | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 4:04 pm | |
| Jeffrey Winter | Jan 9, 2003 4:25 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 5:43 pm | |
| Jeffrey Winter | Jan 9, 2003 6:10 pm | |
| Jeffrey Winter | Jan 9, 2003 6:11 pm | |
| Tim Funk | Jan 9, 2003 6:14 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 7:08 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 7:11 pm | |
| Tim Funk | Jan 10, 2003 4:29 am | |
| Jacob Hookom | Jan 10, 2003 6:36 am | |
| Cox, Charlie | Jan 10, 2003 6:47 am | |
| Tim Funk | Jan 10, 2003 6:52 am | |
| AAron nAAs | Jan 10, 2003 7:03 am | |
| Jacob Hookom | Jan 10, 2003 7:06 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 10, 2003 3:53 pm | |
| neal | Jan 19, 2003 10:10 pm |
| Subject: | RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Turner, John (JTur...@AAS.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 9, 2003 1:45:29 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.tomcat.users | |
The cost of getting a new customer is much higher than the cost of servicing a repeat customer. For example, in the cellular industry, the last number I saw was $400 to get a new customer (in the US). So, at $39.99/month or less, it's at least 10 months or longer before you even see a dime of profit, not to mention the cost of supporting that customer that first year. And if they leave, you end up with nothing.
John
-----Original Message----- From: neal [mailto:neal...@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
What you're talking about is repeat business .. I'm talking about getting the introductions in the first place. Well, aside from the discussion of the importance of SEs in a business model, I think most would agree it is a commonly used tool - independent of ideals.
I'm going to look more into Apache and I will also take a look at the patch that apparently exists for working around the 302 that someone else wrote. Thanks for the tips.
As for the future of Tomcat in this regard, I personally would love to see the 302 thing go away. It will be interesting to see which direction is taken.
Thanks. Neal





