| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Joe Abley | Sep 19, 1998 9:27 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Sep 19, 1998 10:24 am | |
| Joe Abley | Sep 19, 1998 10:38 am | |
| Joe Abley | Sep 19, 1998 10:45 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Sep 19, 1998 10:49 am | |
| John Polstra | Sep 19, 1998 1:32 pm | |
| Joe Abley | Sep 19, 1998 4:16 pm | |
| Mark Huizer | Sep 19, 1998 4:36 pm | |
| Joe Abley | Sep 19, 1998 6:33 pm | |
| Dan Nelson | Sep 19, 1998 8:13 pm | |
| David Holland | Sep 19, 1998 9:00 pm | |
| Joe Abley | Sep 19, 1998 10:02 pm | |
| Peter Wemm | Sep 20, 1998 12:50 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Sep 20, 1998 2:29 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Sep 20, 1998 2:48 am | |
| David Holland | Sep 20, 1998 10:55 am | |
| David Holland | Sep 20, 1998 11:04 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Sep 20, 1998 2:24 pm | |
| David Holland | Sep 20, 1998 4:39 pm | |
| Terry Lambert | Sep 21, 1998 1:17 am | |
| David Holland | Sep 21, 1998 11:30 am | |
| David Holland | Sep 24, 1998 1:58 pm |
| Subject: | Re: ELF ldconfig | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Joe Abley (jab...@clear.co.nz) | |
| Date: | Sep 19, 1998 10:02:36 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-current | |
On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 12:00:55AM -0400, David Holland wrote:
That was my concern. Surely there must come a time when two versions of a shared library exist (with identical major version numbers), and an application requires to be dynamically linked to the older of the two because of some incompatibility with the newer library?
Standard ELF doesn't allow this, or support minor version numbers.
Even worse things happen when you have two builds of (say) libslang.so.1 that were compiled against different libcs and are thus not interchangeable...
So remind me why ELF is a good idea? :)
-- Joe Abley <jab...@clear.co.nz> Tel +64 9 912-4065, Fax +64 9 912-5008 Network Architect, CLEAR Net http://www.clear.net.nz/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message





