15 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Question about proxy cache when i...
FromSent OnAttachments
Jérôme LoyetMay 12, 2009 1:37 am 
"坏人"May 12, 2009 7:26 am 
Igor SysoevMay 12, 2009 7:31 am 
Jérôme LoyetMay 12, 2009 7:35 am 
Jérôme LoyetMay 12, 2009 7:52 am 
"坏人"May 12, 2009 1:18 pm 
Jim OhlsteinMay 12, 2009 1:41 pm 
张立冰May 12, 2009 6:22 pm 
Jérôme LoyetMay 19, 2009 8:13 am 
Igor SysoevMay 20, 2009 5:06 am 
Jérôme LoyetMay 20, 2009 5:32 am 
Igor SysoevMay 20, 2009 5:35 am 
Maxim DouninMay 20, 2009 6:41 am 
Igor SysoevMay 20, 2009 6:44 am 
Arvind JayaprakashJun 10, 2009 10:22 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Question about proxy cache when it expiresActions...
From:Igor Sysoev (is@rambler-co.ru)
Date:May 20, 2009 6:44:14 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:42:12PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:

Hello!

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 04:36:12PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 02:32:39PM +0200, J?r?me Loyet wrote:

I'll try to look into the code to see what I can do. Do you have any lead to guide me on this quest ? :)

This is complex thing. It requires sending notifications from one worker to another when busy lock is being freed.

BTW, what about something like "in-process" busy locks? This will effectively limit number of requests simulteneously send to backends to number of worker processes. At least it looks much better than nothing, and should be simpler.

Yes, they are much simpler, but I want to do it at once.