atom feed18 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] Re: is namecanvas obsole...
FromSent OnAttachments
Tim BlechmannDec 29, 2004 1:41 pm.pd, .pd, .pd
Krzysztof CzajaDec 30, 2004 3:57 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 30, 2004 7:07 am 
Tim BlechmannDec 30, 2004 7:53 am 
Miller PucketteDec 30, 2004 11:02 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 30, 2004 11:14 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 30, 2004 11:35 am 
Tim BlechmannDec 30, 2004 12:43 pm 
Tim BlechmannDec 30, 2004 1:02 pm 
ixDec 30, 2004 2:26 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 31, 2004 10:50 am 
Mathieu BouchardDec 31, 2004 11:37 am 
Tim BlechmannJan 2, 2005 3:37 am 
Thomas GrillJan 2, 2005 4:02 am 
Tim BlechmannJan 2, 2005 5:14 am.pd
Krzysztof CzajaJan 3, 2005 6:28 am 
Krzysztof CzajaJan 3, 2005 6:33 am 
Frank BarknechtJan 3, 2005 6:45 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] Re: is namecanvas obsolete or not?
From:Thomas Grill (gr@grrrr.org)
Date:Jan 2, 2005 4:02:14 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

Hey, why not have _local_ variable-tables ? That would be a real cool feature, especially as it would eliminate symbol-table pollution by temporary names when instantiating the same abstraction many many times, especially dynamically. Each patcher would have some kind of variable-table which would be destroyed as the same time as the patcher, just like an object's state is destroyed at the same time as the object, and just like a C function's state is destroyed when that function returns.

Great idea!... i'll strongly support that!

best greetings, Thomas