35 messages in com.redhat.fedora-listRe: Problem booting after Yum update ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Min ChenNov 27, 2005 4:00 pm 
David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud)Nov 27, 2005 5:28 pm 
Michael A. PetersNov 27, 2005 6:41 pm 
Min ChenNov 27, 2005 7:04 pm 
Min ChenNov 27, 2005 7:15 pm 
Rey CruzNov 27, 2005 7:31 pm 
Sam VarshavchikNov 27, 2005 7:42 pm 
Neil CherryNov 27, 2005 8:58 pm 
Min ChenNov 27, 2005 9:10 pm 
David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud)Nov 27, 2005 9:26 pm 
Min ChenNov 27, 2005 9:46 pm 
Michael A. PetersNov 28, 2005 12:17 am 
David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud)Nov 28, 2005 4:53 am 
John SummerfiedNov 28, 2005 5:35 am 
Charles E "Rick" Taylor IVNov 28, 2005 6:41 am 
Hans MüllerNov 28, 2005 8:46 am 
Neil CherryNov 28, 2005 5:10 pm 
John SummerfiedNov 28, 2005 9:36 pm 
Min ChenDec 1, 2005 3:32 pm 
David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud)Dec 1, 2005 6:16 pm 
Min ChenDec 1, 2005 9:25 pm 
David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud)Dec 1, 2005 10:04 pm 
Tony FosterDec 1, 2005 11:09 pm 
Min ChenDec 3, 2005 10:36 pm 
Hans MüllerDec 4, 2005 12:49 am 
James WilkinsonDec 5, 2005 1:26 pm 
Tony FosterDec 5, 2005 4:15 pm 
TimDec 6, 2005 4:10 am 
James WilkinsonDec 8, 2005 12:20 am 
TimDec 8, 2005 7:59 am 
Mike McCartyDec 8, 2005 8:37 am 
Tony FosterDec 8, 2005 9:20 am 
James WilkinsonDec 8, 2005 9:37 am 
Mike McCartyDec 8, 2005 11:03 am 
TimDec 9, 2005 2:51 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Problem booting after Yum update of FC4Actions...
From:Tim (igno@yahoo.com.au)
Date:Dec 8, 2005 7:59:17 am
List:com.redhat.fedora-list

someone suggested:

Try "ping google.com" for several hours, and see how many packets you drop.

Tim:

I hope you don't mean continuously. That would constitute abuse.

James Wilkinson:

That's a fairly harsh definition of abuse you've got.

They've made the ping service available in the same way as they make the HTTP service available. Accessing Google's web pages once a second would not be OTT for a suitably busy site.

What makes you think that Google has provided you with a ping responder? Many systems respond to ping, but that's often a default behaviour, most of them won't have deliberately provided you with something for doing ping tests with. It's a bit like saying most ISPs will let spam through their systems, so sending spam is okay.

I think that you'd find that many would consider such pinging to be an abuse of their services, I certainly would.

Continuous pinging *is* necessary occasionally as a form of network diagnostic: it tells the network administrator whether (and in conjunction with traceroute, where) to complain about network timeouts.

Fair enough, but do such things with the consent of the equipment owners. If you're testing your equipment, do so against someone that doesn't mind it.

I selected Google partly because of the size and capacity of their servers and network connections.

I don't think I'm abusing Google. I'm using the facilities they make available in the way they're supposed to be used. And I'm not taking anywhere *near* unreasonably large amounts of resources to do so.

As before, what makes you think that Google has provided you with a ping responder for such tests?