atom feed28 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] sourceforge dev
FromSent OnAttachments
Max NeupertDec 17, 2005 6:22 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerDec 17, 2005 1:39 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 17, 2005 2:19 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerDec 17, 2005 5:18 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigDec 18, 2005 3:48 am 
Mathieu BouchardDec 18, 2005 6:01 am 
geigerDec 18, 2005 6:14 am 
Max NeupertDec 18, 2005 6:36 am 
cDec 18, 2005 6:46 am 
Mathieu BouchardDec 18, 2005 6:51 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 18, 2005 7:10 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerDec 18, 2005 11:00 am 
geigerDec 18, 2005 12:53 pm 
geigerDec 18, 2005 1:31 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerDec 18, 2005 2:19 pm 
Max NeupertDec 18, 2005 3:52 pm 
geigerDec 19, 2005 4:36 am 
Mathieu BouchardDec 19, 2005 9:49 am 
Marc LavalléeDec 19, 2005 11:01 am 
Mathieu BouchardDec 19, 2005 12:03 pm 
Frank BarknechtDec 19, 2005 12:51 pm 
Marc LavalléeDec 19, 2005 1:02 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 19, 2005 1:02 pm 
Marc LavalléeDec 19, 2005 1:14 pm 
Frank BarknechtDec 19, 2005 1:26 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 19, 2005 1:54 pm 
Marc LavalléeDec 19, 2005 2:33 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 20, 2005 2:15 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] sourceforge dev
From:Mathieu Bouchard (mat@artengine.ca)
Date:Dec 18, 2005 6:51:19 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, geiger wrote:

I am against adding translaters to the CVS developers. Thats not because I am against doing the translations, or because I think this work is not equally important as programming, but because I think the work is doable without CVS access, and translation is not code (which is what the CVS is for in the first place).

It's possible to code without CVS access too! look at how Miller works.

Translations are put into TCL source files.

Is TCL not enough of a Real Programming Language for you?

How is translating not a form of development?

Then why are Developers called Developers and not just Programmers?