atom feed10 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Nginx response rate increases wit...
FromSent OnAttachments
Asif AliJun 15, 2009 11:19 pm 
Dave CheneyJun 15, 2009 11:54 pm 
Igor SysoevJun 16, 2009 3:04 am 
Avleen VigJun 16, 2009 3:26 am 
Igor SysoevJun 16, 2009 3:54 am 
Dave CheneyJun 16, 2009 3:56 am 
Avleen VigJun 16, 2009 4:34 am 
Asif AliJun 17, 2009 6:19 am 
Igor SysoevJun 17, 2009 6:29 am 
Dave CheneyJun 17, 2009 7:11 am 
Subject:Re: Nginx response rate increases with more upstream ports
From:Igor Sysoev (is@rambler-co.ru)
Date:Jun 16, 2009 3:54:01 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Avleen Vig wrote:

2009/6/16 Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru>:

What do you mean by upstream ports ? This

   upstream backend {        server  backend:9000;        server  backend:9001;        server  backend:9002;        server  backend:9003;        ...    }

In this case you run 50 backend processes and they compete for CPU.

Hmm I have a total of 40 unique upstream server:port listed, in about 12 different upstream{} blocks.

Does this mean I should run 40 nginx child processes to get the most efficiency? Or something which divides equally into 40 (10, 20)?

No, I said about backend processes, but not about nginx workers.