Boris Unckel wrote:
To turn Log into an abstract class means that no native implementation will
ever be possible. It would definitly mean that you will need an wrapper
class. Currently there is just x4juli supporting native JCL support for
java.util.logging (X4JuliLogger extends jul.Logger implements JCL).
But this is also a chance for log4j2.
What do you mean by "native" implementation ? Do you mean a multiple
inheritance to implement the Log type from JCL and the Logger type from
java.util.logging ?
11 messages in org.apache.commons.devRe: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API