16 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Nginx VS Nginx + Varnish
FromSent OnAttachments
Gen GennixOct 9, 2008 1:49 pm 
Dave CheneyOct 9, 2008 4:54 pm 
Robert GabrielOct 10, 2008 12:58 am 
Gen GennixOct 10, 2008 5:03 am 
Robert GabrielOct 10, 2008 5:37 am 
Phillip B OldhamOct 10, 2008 5:50 am 
Gen GennixOct 10, 2008 6:44 am 
Gen GennixOct 10, 2008 6:50 am 
Igor SysoevOct 10, 2008 7:05 am 
Victor IggyOct 10, 2008 4:25 pm 
Victor IggyOct 10, 2008 4:30 pm 
Jeffrey 'jf' LimOct 12, 2008 2:20 am 
Victor IggyOct 12, 2008 11:22 am 
PraveenOct 14, 2008 11:14 am 
Victor IggyOct 14, 2008 11:35 am 
PraveenOct 14, 2008 12:20 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Nginx VS Nginx + VarnishActions...
From:Gen Gennix (lis@ruby-forum.com)
Date:Oct 10, 2008 6:44:28 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Compression, gzip. You should try it, maybe for jpeg is not actually worth it... Hmm, try what can i say.

I already use static gzip on css and javascript file. And for jpeg, it is not worth it, indeed.

Moreover, if you look at the monitoring image (in attachment), the loss of time is while sending request and receiving http-headers from server (25% of the total time).

I was wondering if we can reduce it?

PS: watch the last line of the image in attachment: it's the javascript from Google Analytics, and the timing is really, really short!

-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.