atom feed35 messages in net.java.dev.ajax.devservice-url derived from value-attrib...
FromSent OnAttachments
Gregory MurrayApr 10, 2007 10:44 pm 
Norbert TruchsessApr 11, 2007 12:03 am 
Norbert TruchsessApr 11, 2007 12:05 am 
Gregory MurrayApr 11, 2007 12:26 am 
Gregory MurrayApr 11, 2007 12:48 am 
Craig McClanahanApr 11, 2007 12:58 am 
Craig McClanahanApr 11, 2007 1:19 am 
Ed BurnsApr 11, 2007 6:32 pm 
Ed BurnsApr 11, 2007 7:52 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 11, 2007 7:53 pm 
Ed BurnsApr 11, 2007 8:28 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 11, 2007 9:41 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 11, 2007 9:44 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 11, 2007 9:51 pm 
Norbert TruchsessApr 11, 2007 10:08 pm 
Norbert TruchsessApr 11, 2007 10:15 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 12, 2007 12:19 am 
Norbert TruchsessApr 12, 2007 1:19 pm 
Norbert TruchsessApr 12, 2007 2:54 pm 
Norbert TruchsessApr 12, 2007 3:43 pm 
Gregory MurrayApr 14, 2007 4:56 pm 
Gregory MurrayApr 14, 2007 5:03 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 14, 2007 5:06 pm 
Ed BurnsApr 16, 2007 8:18 am 
Gregory MurrayApr 16, 2007 8:32 am 
Ed BurnsApr 16, 2007 8:55 am 
Gregory MurrayApr 16, 2007 9:09 am 
Norb...@t-online.deApr 16, 2007 9:21 am 
Ed BurnsApr 17, 2007 9:59 am 
Craig McClanahanApr 17, 2007 10:23 am 
Norbert TruchsessApr 17, 2007 1:05 pm 
Craig McClanahanApr 17, 2007 3:30 pm 
Gregory MurrayApr 18, 2007 1:54 am 
Norb...@t-online.deApr 18, 2007 4:44 am 
Norbert TruchsessApr 19, 2007 1:40 pm 
Subject:service-url derived from value-attribute? (was: component.getClientId only unique to a given page)
From:Norb...@t-online.de (Norb@t-online.de)
Date:Apr 16, 2007 9:21:15 am
List:net.java.dev.ajax.dev

Greg,

Ed used this misleading subject, so the 'reall' question got unanswered.

Even if this breaks some of our samples (which just means we have to rename some value-attributes to 'service') my Vote goes to:

'A ValueExpression in Value-attribute shall allways be evaluated on server-side and the result shall be sent to the widget as literal. if there's no 'service'-attribute in widget's tag, there ain't no service-attribute being rendered to the widget.'

- Norbert

-----Original Message----- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:18:47 +0200 Subject: Re: component.getClientId only unique to a given page. From: Ed Burns To: de@ajax.dev.java.net

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:41:24 -0700, Craig McClanahan said:

EB> When using jMaki with JSF, IF there is no "service" attribute but there EB> is a "value" attribute on the a:widget tag, AND the value of the "value" EB> attribute is an EL ValueExpression, THEN there should be no service EB> handed to the widget. Rather, the system should make it so that the EB> postback happens to the regular JSF page. EB> CM> Ed, does this really cover all the use cases? EB> CM> Consider an autocomplete text field ... the fact that I might use a CM> value binding expression on the "value" property is orthogonal to the CM> fact that the widget *also* needs some sort of service callback to get CM> the set of valid options as the user types keystrokes. If I am reading CM> your proposed functionality description right, it would seem to prohibit CM> this kind of combination. EB> EB> Yes. I see. You need the ValueExpression when you render the page, and EB> when the form is actually submitted (via Ajax or otherwise). You need EB> the service only when doing autocomplete *before* the form is EB> submitted. However, as I stated my above rule (which is the same rule EB> for this I've been stating for at least a year) I'm addressing the case EB> where *there is no service attribute* and there is a value attribute. EB> Another clause on the rule is necessary to handle your case. EB> EB> Let me restate my rule to consider your case. EB> EB> if (using jMaki with JSF) { EB> EB> if (no service attribute on tag) {

CM> I am not omfortable with this restriction.

Greg, we need to come to a resolution on this. Please drive it to conclusion. I think all the requirements have been listed elsewhere in this thread.