| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Davide D'Amico | Jan 18, 2010 1:34 pm | |
| merlin corey | Jan 18, 2010 1:42 pm | |
| Davide D'Amico | Jan 18, 2010 2:29 pm | |
| Cliff Wells | Jan 18, 2010 2:34 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm | |
| Momchil Ivanov | Jan 18, 2010 6:42 pm | |
| Davide D'Amico | Jan 20, 2010 3:56 am | |
| Tobia Conforto | Jan 21, 2010 3:36 am |
| Subject: | Re: nginx performance test | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Michael Shadle (mike...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 18, 2010 2:36:54 pm | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
/me wonders why nginx can't automatically allocate the RAM needed for server_names based on the configuration? it's static (except for wildcarded/regex matched ones, that's the only variable here)
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Cliff Wells <cli...@develix.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 13:42 -0800, merlin corey wrote:
And I always wonder when I see it in configurations... Did you REALLY have too long of a server_name that you had to change the hash bucket size? http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/server_names.html#optimization
More likely, too *many* server_names. I have had to adjust this on some servers that act as shared hosting systems.
Regards, Cliff
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list ngi...@nginx.org http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list ngi...@nginx.org http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx





